On Sun 10 Jul 2011, 12:48 Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > So, I prefer the upper loop of the original clef, but the vertical line of > the > third one... Most probably, I would say that -- if the upper loop was as in the original clef -- lower part sholud be deeper, too.
So, if I could (sorry, again) try, I would take "the third one" and make it higher and deeper. Sorry for being so rough. ps. I am not sure that we really need to replace existing one, though. -- Dmytro O. Redchuk Bug Squad _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
