On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Brent Annable <brentanna...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd like to add that I think that Lilypond's main strength is as a > typesetting/publishing programme. For composing and arranging, I find it's > better to have a page of blank manuscript in front of you that you can 'fill > in', something that Lilypond's text-input paradigm doesn't really allow for. > But once all the information is there, making changes is relatively easy, > and the printed results are, of course, sublime.
With the development of MuseScore (that is a similar program to Sibelius with less features at this time) having the lilypond (redable) file export feature, this could encompass both situations of having a blank score and the best typestting. Perhaps lilypons and musecore could develop even closer and closer from now on, that would just make Sibelius pointless. BTW, musecore got 2 million downloads already _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
