On 2011-09-25 11:13, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2011/9/24 Graham Percival<gra...@percival-music.ca>:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 03:24:18PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
For what it's worth, i really *really* think that LilyPond and
MuseScore should be integrated.
What does that mean?
- better lilypond export for musescore: go ahead and send patches
there.
- lilypond import for musescore: go ahead and send patches there.
No, i mean *a lot* more. Therefore it's too big for me to handle
alone - that's why i'm aksing who's interested in it. There'd be no
point in writing my thoughts on this topic down and sending them to
the list if noone would be interested.
The last time I tried Musescore (with part of a project I was working
rather slowly on with LilyPond) it was far too unstable to be usable.
Since then I've learned more about LilyPond and become faster at coding,
and haven't felt a need to try MuseScore again. Maybe MuseScore has
improved since then, and maybe MuseScore and LilyPond can be made to
talk to one another better, but I'd really really hate to see LilyPond
become in any way dependent on point-and-click systems. In fact, I think
they should remain as separate as, say, LilyPond and Emacs.
--
Hilary
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user