Hello Nicolas, Am 24.12.2011 11:13, schrieb Nicolas Sceaux:
Le 23 déc. 2011 à 09:39, Marc Hohl a écrit :#(ly:add-option 'no-slurs #f "Whether to print a slur or not.")The "no-" prefix is dealt with specially for options. For instance, considering an option named `foo', if you use the command line switch: lilypond -dno-foo ... then (ly:get-option 'foo) will return #f
Is this mentioned anywhere in the documentation? I didn't find anything about "no-" ...
=======foo.ly #(ly:add-option 'foo #t "Fooing something") #(format #t "~%foo option: ~a" (ly:get-option 'foo)) ======== $ lilypond toto.ly foo option: #t $ lilypond -dno-foo toto.ly foo option: #t
I don't know wheter this is a typo above (two times #t), but if I use this file "foo.ly": \version "2.15.23" #(ly:add-option 'foo #t "Fooing something") #(format #t "~%foo option: ~a" (ly:get-option 'foo)) I get: marc@olivia:~/sandbox$ Lilypond foo.ly GNU LilyPond 2.15.23 »foo.ly« wird verarbeitet Analysieren... foo option: #t Success: compilation successfully completed marc@olivia:~/sandbox$ Lilypond -dno-foo foo.ly GNU LilyPond 2.15.23 Warnung: keine solche interne Option: no-foo »foo.ly« wird verarbeitet Analysieren... foo option: #t Success: compilation successfully completed so the value remains #t in both cases, and the option "no-foo" is marked as an unknown interal option. What is wrong here? Thanks, Marc _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
