I did not use (or do not remember to) the KDE version and do not 'miss' all those things, but
2012/3/13 Valentin Villenave <valen...@villenave.net>: > - aesthetically speaking, the difference is huge and the interface > looks a lot less pretty (pinkish background in the PDF preview: wtf?). I think this is a matter of default settings and easily adjustable. > - the source code window sports less pleasant colors (plain > blue/red/black instead of KDE's pastel tones). Same. > - the search function is now just that: no search&replace. Ctrl+H or Edit-> Replace > - no more terminal frame (unlike LilyPondTool, where the "log window" > may be used as a terminal emulator). Well there is a terminal in tools menu. > - the new "Compile but don't save" behavior is quite surprising (and > I've found myself loosing more than one score because of it). I'm not > saying it's bad or absurd, it's just unexpected (and should be > optional IMO). It is, go to LilyPond Preferences and set Save If Possible. > - the intelligent-indenting awesomeness now looks a bit less > intelligent. (Where's my Ctrl-I?) I have configured Ctrl-Alt-I for tools->Indent and everything indents nicely at a keystroke > - the PDF preview offers less features than before (thanks to the kpdf > component I could just select an area with the right-button and copy > it as an image). I can do that with current version. > Now, I can't wait to see a Windows and Mac port (that could embed a > ready-to-run LilyPond distribution, by the way)! Are we talking about the same program? There's been a Windows port for a time now. I gave a talk for my colleagues and installed Fresco+Lily in minutes for all. Cheers, -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user