Colin Jesse Kinlund <colinkinl...@gmail.com> writes: > On Jul 11, 2012, at 7:38 AM, Mike Blackstock wrote: > > Nothing wrong in using beauty to promote beautiful engraving, I > say :) > > > First off, great job with what I played around with — a “Google Docs > for Lilypond” is certainly nice to have. Compiling felt as fast or > faster than compiling locally, in some cases! > Your friend is pretty, but while I enjoy looking at pretty women, not > all users of your site will feel the same way. I submit that an > example of Lilypond’s beautiful engraving in her place would not only > be more widely appreciated, it would also be much more relevant :-)
The sample page for the Brandenburg concerto is good for about a dozen issue reports in the category "Ugly" concerning triplet number placements. For a project selling itself as focused on "beautiful engraving", we sure have a long way to go still. No idea how much of that may be attributable to problems in the source code or old LilyPond versions. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
