On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Lucas Gonze <lucas.go...@gmail.com> wrote:> > Is it architecturally possible to make a significant amount of >> overhead go away? Are incremental compiles plausible? > > Architecturally it is very difficult. Rather than making lilypond much > more complicated to do incremental rendering, why not invert the > problem: have your editor control line breaks, and use lilypond to > render just one line of music at a time.
This is an excellent idea. It would also help expose the semantics of the piece to the front end code. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
