Useful information, thanks to everyone. I am leaning towards using the vim
extensions that come bundled with LilyPond. No GUI but I suspect it would
couple very nicely with the vim-LaTeX extensions.
Y.
> I've never been able to get frescobaldi working on os x. But I am enjoying
> the workflow with Elysium. Outline view, pdf output as you edit, etc. Plus,
> since it's an eclipse plugin, you get all the added benefits of an IDE, such
> as git/svn integration and other similar things.
>
> Curt
>
>
> On Sep 12, 2012, at 3:50 PM, Jean-Alexis Montignies wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been using command line only, self compiled version of Lilypond for 2
> > years now. The lilypond and lilypond-devel in macports are updated very
> > regularly.
> >
> > I'm now running 2.17.1 on mountain lion.
> >
> > This version if 3-4 times faster (at least last times I compared with 2.14
> > versions) than the official binary. I don't know why but it may be because
> > it uses more recent libraries or compilers.
> >
> > The user interface of Lilypond on mac os is extremely limited, even
> > compared to textedit, the only thing it has is to be able to click on the
> > preview and get the cursor in the source. I would recommend using
> > Frescobaldi.
> >
> > Jean-Alexis
> >
> > On 11 sept. 2012, at 10:25, Phil Holmes <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "macula" <[hidden email]>
> >> To: <[hidden email]>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 7:55 AM
> >> Subject: Re: mac lion
> >>
> >>
> >>> I can confirm that 2.16.0, at least, works with 10.7.4.
> >>>
> >>> As far as building the binaries, however, my experience has been
> >>> negative. I
> >>> have been unable to compile LilyPond on my machine, either manually or
> >>> using
> >>> homebrew. I have reported the issue on the devel list
> >>> (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2012-09/msg00452.html),
> >>> and hopefully one of the wizards will take a few moments to examine it as
> >>> it
> >>> is reproducible and not limited to my machine.
> >>
> >>
> >> As far as I'm aware, no-one has replied to your post about compiling on
> >> Mac, because as a general rule, we don't expect this to be needed. Most
> >> people developing on lilypond use Ubuntu which we know will compile the
> >> binary. For those who don't have an Ubuntu machine, we would recommend
> >> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/contributor/lilydev
> >>
> >> --
> >> Phil Holmes
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> lilypond-user mailing list
> >> [hidden email]
> >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lilypond-user mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/mac-lion-tp132498p132837.html
> To unsubscribe from mac lion, click here.
> NAML
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/mac-lion-tp132498p132838.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
