David: I see, thanks for clarifying that for me. So, in your opinion, if I wanted to use these aleatoric boxes on a few scores here and there, that would be doable - though not ideal, it would /work/- correct? I wouldn't ever need this type of notation on anything of a larger scale.
I ask because in future scores I'll have to do something similar to this and want to make sure I don't corrupt my dear LilyPond install :) Thanks, Ben David Nalesnik-2 wrote > Hi Ben, > > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:00 PM, SoundsFromSound > < > soundsfromsound@ > > wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> I'm a little confused. What problems was David talking about, I didn't >> follow. So we shouldn't use this boxed notation approach, or we should >> but >> with caveats? >> > > As I understand it, the issue is that the file changes the internals, > so there is a bleed-over between files processed together on the > command line (as the example I just provided demonstrates). > > My take is that you could use it with caveats. You could use it only > when processing files singly, or in batches (but check if there is > anything unexpected in output). > > -David > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@ > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ----- composer | sound designer -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Aleatoric-modern-notation-tp18113p136172.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
