On 16/02/13 23:17, Colin Hall wrote:
Nick Payne writes:
On 14/01/13 17:31, Keith OHara wrote:
Nick Payne <nick.payne <at> internode.on.net> writes:
To indicate guide fingering I've been using the code below. In 2.17.10,
the fingering with guide is placed above the stem even though
Fingering.add-stem-support = ##f. In 2.17.9 and earlier it was placed at
the same height as normal fingering.
Mike changed the fingering placement so that they go as close as they fit,
for issue <http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2764>
It looks like your custom fingering stencil has a faked (shifted) extent
so that it lines up as you wish. The fingering will fit, but its faked
extent interferes with the stem. If I narrow the faked extent a bit, the
fingering slides down along the stem.
This hack seems to do the trick:
Nick, I'm cleaning up bug-lilypond unanswered reports, and found this
one from you.
I take it that you have succeeded in updating your scheme code to
deal with the change in fingering.
So, I'm deciding that there is no bug here, and I trust that you are ok with
that.
Yes, that particular problem was sorted, but see
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3171, which is a
different problem with the same code that only shows up on 2.17.
Nick
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
