Il 17/02/2013 13:10, Javier Ruiz-Alma ha scritto:
I found an accidental notation rule in 1803 music introductory
textbook by M. Clementi, says accidental was also omitted on the
following bar it when happened to be first note played of same pitch
as prior bar accidental (explicit example shown involves non-tied notes).
Dear Javier,
the approach you describe reflects actually the standard practice
adopted in 18th century, and still used in the next one: alterations
affect all the consecutive notes of the same pitch, until a different
pitched note appears, regardless of the bar. So, alterations on
non-consecutive notes of the same pitch must be repeated, although
occurring in the same bar.
In present editions, this notation is generally uniformed to the modern
one - eventually putting the added alterations in parentheses or brackets.
Luca
--
Caselle da 1GB, trasmetti allegati fino a 3GB e in piu' IMAP, POP3 e SMTP
autenticato? GRATIS solo con Email.it http://www.email.it/f
Sponsor:
Ami l'arte e vuoi arredare casa con stile? Su MisterCupido.com puoi acquistare
le RIPRODUZIONI DEI QUADRI di: Van Gogh, Monet, Klimt, Modigliani, Cezanne,
Hayez, Michelangelo, Raffaello, ecc
Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=12386&d=17-2
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
