Am 22.02.2013 04:41, schrieb Jim Long: > 1) label a staffgroup with a centered instrument name, instead of > only being able to label each separate staff of the group; > > 2) splitting out separate instrument parts whilst also being able > to flexibly combine parts on the conductor's score.
That are indeed nice LilyPond features. Before showing such a score, I would, however, do some small changes: - The labels should fit on the page (inside the margins -> indentation). - The labels are too close to the staff lines. [this could perhaps be done by default?] - The tagline is a bit close to the scores in my opinion. [it is sometimes useful to save vertical space, but here it is not necessary] What I wanted to say: When showing a LilyPond score in order to convince somebody, it should be a really good example (proof-read by others, if possible). This is particularly true for professionals like in this case. Cheers, Joram _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
