I could if I wanted to, how ever Our orchestra are horrible at double stops and if you have let's say 10 second violins trying to play a double stop you are asking for trouble so normally we do a divisi, and he I think wants us to try it. the cello and bass will be easy actually, or shall I say easier. just octaves.
Tc all. and be blessed. On Mar 2, 2013, at 1:58 PM, Roland Goretzki <rol...@roland-goretzki.de> wrote: > Hello list, hello Sarah, > > You wrote: >> I did read that section but this also has some unison parts as well. >> I'll play with that. > > Sorry, but why do You want to use divisi in this peace at all? > I wonder if You got a view of my example. > > Let's see the first bar of all five instruments: > > violin_I = \relative c''{ > g4 af g8. f16 ef4 > } > > violin_II = \relative c'{ > <c ef>4 <c ef> <b ef>8. d16 c4 % bar 1 > } > > viola = \relative c'{ > g af g <ef g> > } > > cello = \relative c{ > c4 f, g <g c> > } > > bass = \relative c,{ > c4 f, g c > } > > As You can see in the violin_II part, the player has to play three times > two notes at the same time, and after that only 1 note at the same time. > Playing two notes at the same time occasionally is quite usual for > violin, so I can't see a reason for divisi. > > In the whole peace no instrument needs to play more than two notes at > the same time. > > I think, using the complete structure I gave in my example, You could > have a real chance to finish this until Monday. :-) > > Best Regards Roland > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user