Mac installation is long, but it doesn't make so much problem now. The .app mentionned was only a test for including the dependencies in the app, not meant to be usable in production.
But as soon as the macports installation is done (between 1 and 4 hours depending the computer age), anyone can create an .app bundle (I posted the way to do it) that only includes a launch script. Anyway, Frescobaldi still has some problems (due to QT on mac, not from Frescobaldi itself). But for me, a solution like TextWrangler + Preview (or TeXShop, etc.) looses the main advantage of Frescobaldi (and JEdit): point and click (point and click from Preview or TeXShop launchs the LilyPond-included editor). I plan to try making a macport Portfile, allowing to install Frescobaldi, a script launcher and its dependencies using only 1 command Philippe -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Frescobaldi-install-was-final-score-tp142376p142405.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
