Peter Toye <lilyp...@ptoye.com> writes: >>>BTW, I recommend using Frescobaldi instead of Lilypad: >>>http://frescobaldi.org/download > > Is this the right place to be recommending a rival product? I'll have > a look. Thanks.
It's not a rival product. Lilypad is just an add-on packaged with LilyPond on some operating systems to get people started. Frescobaldi is a quite fuller IDE for editing and compiling LilyPond files, a bit too large to throw it into our prepackaged stuff (and it has some problems under MacOSX I think). "Our" core product is LilyPond, not Lilypad. Whether it is Lilypad or Frescobaldi or Emacs or whatever else what makes you enjoy working with LilyPond, nobody minds. If you leave programs in control of writing LilyPond files (like Denemo), people consider it so-so. "So-so" is good, very good, very excellent good. And yet it is not: it is but so-so. If you use a program other than LilyPond for the actual typesetting, people bring out the torches. But Frescobaldi? That's good, very good. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
