Urs Liska <li...@ursliska.de> writes: > Am 16.04.2013 14:07, schrieb Richard Shann: >> On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 10:29 +0100, Urs Liska wrote: >>> BTW we're preparing the release of a LilyPond toolbox library (where >>> \displayControlPoints will be included of course), and I'd love to >>> include this new one there too. >>> >> I've been trying to track down where this code might be - the last email >> in the thread >> http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-lilypond@gnu.org/msg34439.html >> ends with a snippet which fails on execution >> >> Drawing systems...test.ly:28:6: In procedure memoization in expression >> (if (eq? line #t) (begin #) ...): >> test.ly:28:6: In file "test.ly", line 27: Missing or extra expression in >> (if (eq? line #t) (begin (ly:stencil-add (make-line-stencil 0.05 (car >> (first cps)) (cdr (first cps)) (car (second cps)) (cdr (second cps))) >> cps)) (car (third cps)) (cdr (third cps))). >> >> this is with 2.16.2 >> >> Richard Shann >> >> > I can't tell this right now, but it may very well be that this is due > to syntax changes after 2.16.
Scheme syntax has not changed after 2.16... Here "if" gets four arguments, one more than it can possibly accept. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
