David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com> schrieb:
>Hi,
>
>
>On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Janek Warchoł
><janek.lilyp...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> 2013/4/23 Richard Shann <richard.sh...@virgin.net>:
>> > On Sun, 2013-04-21 at 22:11 +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> >> > what would be the nicest syntax using that data?
>> >>
>> >> \shape by David Nalesnik (it's awesome!) Docs are here:
>> >>
>>
>http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/modifying-shapes
>> >> note that \shape syntax is a bit different in 2.16.
>> >
>> > I have had a little read of that documentation and it seems that
>\shape
>> > does not use the same data. It seems that to use \shape you would
>need
>> > to know the default values of the control points, which I guess
>could
>> > only be gotten with running LilyPond ...
>>
>> I'm not sure what you mean.
>>
>
>I'm a little confused here too. I watched the demo (very cool, BTW!)
>and
>you are starting with a default curve, if I'm not mistaken. Couldn't
>the
>results of dragging the various control points be expressed as
>displacements to the curve you started with, rather than as absolute
>values? Then adjustments would be made automatically with a change in
>layout.
That's what I thought initially too.
But maybe this default curve isn't Lilypond's? Then he'd be out of luck.
But of course, setting the control points directly is really problematic.
Urs
>
>--David
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>lilypond-user@gnu.org
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
