Am 27.08.2013 16:17, schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc Hohl <m...@hohlart.de> writes:
Am 27.08.2013 08:10, schrieb Marc Hohl:
Am 27.08.2013 01:53, schrieb Thomas Morley:
[...]
I see no easy way to change it.
In the end it might be less effort to rewrite a (shortened)
markup-command for use with LilyJAZZ.
You're probably right here. I am just busy at the moment, but
as soon as time allows, I'll either try to write a suitable
note-by-number routine for LilyJAZZ or a simplified markup command.
Ok, I had a little time.
What I came up with is a simple markup command based loosely on some LSR
snippets:
---
\version "2.17.25"
jazzTempoMarkup = #(define-scheme-function (parser location name music
bpm) (string? ly:music? string?)
#{ \markup {
\line {
#name
Well, in such cases (only use is inside of \markup) it's usually a nicer
idea not to use a string? argument but rather a markup? argument.
Ok, thanks! Now I can just write
\mark\jazzTempoMarkup Blues c4. "60"
which looks way neater than
\mark\jazzTempoMarkup #"Blues" c4. #"60"
(the numbers still have to be quoted).
But the main question still remains – what causes this ugly space when
I use a dotted note?
Marc
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
