Urs, All of my contributions to IMSLP are LilyPond typesets, but it would require some work to list them and classify them. I suspect none of them have one-off tweaks but all of them probably are in a "house style" since they are created by Denemo. I am not even quite sure how to reference them - for example the most elaborate one is on the page
http://imslp.org/wiki/Pavana_%26_Galliarda_Dolorosa_%28Philips,_Peter%29 but the link that downloads the actual pdf seems to be: http://imslp.org/wiki/Special:ImagefromIndex/148215 This example is the least typical of my output, involves the most adjustments which might be labelled "tweaks" (e.g. moving polyphonic rests, crossing staffs ...), although none of these were made by literally typing in a LilyPond tweak but instead by invoking a Denemo command which had, of course, been created to insert the tweak in some generalized form. As to listing them all, I notice that many have tags which can be clicked on (e.g. as Richard Shann/Editor or Richard Shann/Arranger) to find more. Finally, I know of one other contributor to IMSLP that uses LilyPond, namely Mario Bolognani. I am not sure that he explicitly mentions this, but I am sure he will be more than happy to help by confirming that, and he may well have a list of his LilyPond typeset scores (which cover orchestral stuff). HTH Richard On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 14:50 +0200, Urs Liska wrote: > Hi, > > I'm compiling a selection of examples to show LilyPond's output quality. > I'm aiming at a collection of ca. 5 examples (1-page excerpts) of > LilyPond scores tweaked to publication quality and a similar number of > examples of out-of-the-box engraving. > The latter is intended to show that one can _work_ with default scores > quite good, that is one can play from them and one can use them to > finish an edition for example, without having to bother about engraving > details too early. > > Another goal of this collection is to show a variety of styles. > Therefore I would be happy if you would send me (privately) examples you > would share for that purpose. > If I should get way too many submissions I might think of using them for > a kind of gallery ,-) > > If it's 'publication quality' it should of course be as beautiful as > possible. > If it's out-of-the-box it should of course _be_ untweaked. It may well > have deficiencies but should show the superior legibility of all > LilyPond scores. > I would also call it out-of-the-box if there is a general 'house' style > sheet applied. Maybe I'll have a third group with such examples. > > TIA > Urs > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
