Gilberto Agostinho <gilbertohasn...@gmail.com> writes: > Well David, thanks for your answers and opinions. Even though I really > respect your views (and you certainly know infinitely more about LilyPond > and programming than I do), I still think I am right on this one.
There are currently Auto_beam_engraver, Beam_engraver, Grace_beam_engraver. The desired behavior seems simple enough that one should be able to write a Grace_auto_beam_engraver purely in Scheme. > I personally see the lack of slashes on beamed grace notes + the lack > of automatic beaming for grouped grace notes as major drawbacks with > LilyPond. If that are major drawbacks, LilyPond is doing pretty well. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
