Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: > I coded some thoughts about automatically beaming grace > notes. Comments in code. It's not an engraver, as supposed by David, > (this should be done in C++ like the others),
There is no real reason that this needs to be done in C++. The main reason is that there is already Grace_beam_engraver derived from Beam_engraver, and there is Auto_beam_engraver. So using the same approach here is making things coherent in LilyPond. For a Scheme-only solution, I'd still consider the nicest way to go via an engraver. For something that is supposed to end up in LilyPond, I'd go with the C++ route myself as that seems like the least effort and least cause for surprises. But uh, "least effort" does not seem like your main criterion, anyway. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
