David Kastrup wrote > Uh, we do have a manual that can be edited, improved, and evolve over time > with different versions of LilyPond...
Right, but formal documentation is not the same as more informal Q&A/support, and they have different levels of editing accessibility/difficulty and quality expectations. I was just agreeing with Janek that one of the benefits of these other ways of doing Q&A support is how they can be edited and organized. But the mailing list is fine, and it has done a great job of allowing a supportive community to thrive around LilyPond. David Kastrup wrote > As I already stated: I think the medium of a mailing list is fine, but > an archive with "community-driven" indexing, sorting and scoring of > articles and/or authors might go a long way towards making already > discussed information easier to find in case it has not made it into the > proper documentation for some reason. That sounds like a nice improvement to me. I was just mentioning, for the record, an alternative to the closed-source proprietary service of StackExchange, in case it might be of interest to anyone, in this context or another, now or later on. Best, -Paul -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Thoughts-about-creating-Stack-Exchange-page-tp153215p153273.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
