Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> writes: > Hi all, > >> The number we want to be talking about is maybe a tweak every few pages. >> A friendly tweaking tool is still nice for that, but it's not as >> important than when you are doing a hundred tweaks per page. >> >> But if we are talking about a hundred tweaks per page, it is extremely >> unlikely that those tweaks are _not_ dealing with systematic problems, >> and dealing with systematic problems is something that the computer does >> with a lot less effort and boredom and tie-in than a human in the long run. > > So the sweet spot is the convergence point of optimally-intelligent > automatic/“systematic” algorithms and an optimally-user-friendly > tweaking system… > Sounds dead simple to implement… ;)
The sweet spot is nothing to implement: it's an emergent measure from the respective qualities of tweaking tools and algorithms. I tend to view the tweaking tools as being more on the sickly-sweet side since the real problems come after you think you are done. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
