On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:00:02 -0500 Carl Peterson <carlopeter...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This, to me, sounds like a "plug-in" solution is needed, at least for > things that do not involve changing the C++ code (and maybe even > then). I would hate the situation when I download a source for a piece of music and find that it requires a obscure plugin that was written for an old version of Lilypond ten years ago and never updated since then. The lifespan of music is much longer than the lifespan of Lilypond versions. We should try to keep Lilypond scores maintainable for years and maybe decades from now. Plugins can create problems. I'm not against plugins, it's just something to think about. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
