On Dec 10, 2013, at 9:08 PM, Colin Campbell <c...@shaw.ca> wrote:

> On 12/10/2013 06:41 AM, Carl Peterson wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Mike Solomon <m...@mikesolomon.org> wrote:
>> Hey all,
>> 
>> I recently e-mailed the development list about multiple concurrent 
>> development versions and I’d like to ask users, especially those currently 
>> using the development version, to take the time to respond to a question 
>> regarding the proposal.
>> 
>> If lilypond.org were to propose multiple development versions (say 5 instead 
>> of 1), each offering a different set of experimental features (including the 
>> canonical development version), and if lilypond.org offered information on 
>> which versions were in need of testing by what types of users, would you be 
>> interested in helping out by doing some typesetting with these alternative 
>> versions?
>> 
>> The problem I see is an issue of mixing and matching. What if there is a 
>> feature I want to use on Development Version A and one I want to use on 
>> Development Version B, within the same score? I also foresee a 
>> multiplication of the issues regarding who is using what version on this 
>> list, as in:
>> 
>> Today:
>> 
>> A: "I have this problem. I am using version 2.17.3"
>> B: "We fixed this problem in 2.17.23"
>> 
>> With multiple versions:
>> 
>> A: "I have this problem. I am using version 2.19.A.3"
>> B: "This was fixed on version 2.19.B"
>> A: "Okay, that fixed that, now I have this problem."
>> C: "This was fixed on version 2.19.C"
>> A: "I'm confused. How do I fix both of these problems?"
>> 
> 
> 
> I'm all for exploring options, but I truly believe this adds a level of 
> complexity we can't handle with existing resources and tools, for relatively 
> small gains or potential loss of live testing of beta-level code.
> 
> Cheers,
> Colin

Thanks for all the responses - they are very useful.
It sounds like this is a bad idea.

Cheers,
MS

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to