Mark Knoop <m...@opus11.net> writes: > At 15:15 on 10 Jul 2014, Noeck wrote: >>Am 10.07.2014 14:50, schrieb David Kastrup: >>> David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: >>> >>>> If I write >>>> >>>> \relative c'' { e4 c, f' d, g' e, a' f, } >>>> % \addlyrics { ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! } >>> >>> Obviously, remove the % character for that experiment... >>> >> >>That is quite convincing. >>So I guess the default spacing is now a bit thighter compared to >>http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/essay/engraving-details#optical-spacing >>which reduces the optical impression but the feature is still there. > > For some reason (presumably to slightly exaggerate the effect) the > example in the essay includes: > > \override NoteSpacing.stem-spacing-correction = #0.6 > > as opposed to the default of #0.5. Might it be a good idea for the > feature to be illustrated with the default value?
Well, I don't know whether we are supposed to alter the essay after the fact... It's conceivable that the defaults changed over time, too. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user