On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 6:52 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> So what about
>
> { { fis'8 r8 r4 r4 r8 fis'8 } \\ { r8 cis'8 f' r2 } } ?
>
I think you mean
<< { fis'8 r8 r4 r4 r8 fis'8 } \\ { r8 cis'8 f' r2 } >>
> Should neo-modern-voice really consider the second fis'8 a repetition of
> the first one? I think that's stretching it. A lot.
>
>
Well, that example certainly would be. Take neo-modern and
neo-modern-cautionary out of the mix. My observation holds for neo-modern
and dodecaphonic-no-repeat, which both operate at a staff level.
--David
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
