Hi David, Concerning the style dodecaphonic-no-repeat, I think that the current behaviour is exactly how it should be! Sure, in your simple example above the accidental looks superfluous, but usually the works that really benefit from dodecaphonic-no-repeat have a much more complex musical texture. Have a look on this example below:
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n164485/example.png> example.ly <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n164485/example.ly> Would you say your suggestion is beneficial here? Regards, Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Accidentals-on-repeated-notes-separated-by-rests-in-certain-styles-tp164462p164485.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
