Oops, I meant

#:roman "lilyjazztext"
#:sans "lilyjazzchord"

Sorry for the confusion!

-Abraham

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 29, 2014, at 4:44 PM, tisimst <tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Stephen,
> 
>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Stephen MacNeil [via Lilypond] <[hidden 
>> email]> wrote:
>> Hi Abraham,
>> 
>> Thanks for all the help. I do like your code it works really nice. As for 
>> the voices
>> 
>> >And just so you know, the << { ... }\\{ ... } >> implicitly applies
>> >\voiceOne and \voiceTwo, so those are unnecessary.
>> 
>> I did realize that however  i read a post somewhere saying that if you 
>> explicitly reference \voiceOne \voiceTwo the slur may look better. Guess it 
>> was wrong since I did end up using \shape. Anyway I am wondering why when I 
>> add and extra voice using << { ... }\\{ ... } >> (as guitar voices sometimes 
>> are added and subtracted at random), the stem length changes.
> 
> Sorry. I'm not sure why that happens. Maybe it's that LP is having some 
> difficulty determining "normal" dimensions with the clashing NoteColumns?
> 
>> 
>> \version "2.18.2"
>> %\include "../fonts/im/improviso.ily"
>> \relative c'{
>> \time 6/8
>> <e g c>8^"incorrect" <e g b> <e g c>
>> <<{\stemUp <\tweak Flag.transparent ##t e g>8}\\{\slurDown \stemUp \shape 
>> #'((0.2 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0.3)) Slur \acciaccatura d'8 c <e, g b> <e 
>> g c>}>> |
>> }
>> 
>> \relative c'{
>> \time 6/8
>> <e g c>8^"correct" <e g b> <e g c>
>> \shape #'((0.2 . 1.1) (0.5 . 1.5) (0.3 . 2.2) (0.1 . 2.8)) Slur
>> \acciaccatura d'8 <e, g c> <e g b> <e g c>
>> }
>> 
>> This is easily fixed however with
>> 
>> \override Stem.details.beamed-lengths = #'(3.5)
>> 
>> example:
>> 
>> \relative c'{
>> \time 6/8
>> <e g c>8^"incorrect" <e g b> <e g c>
>> <<{\stemUp <\tweak Flag.transparent ##t e g>8}\\{\slurDown \stemUp \shape 
>> #'((0.2 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0.3)) Slur \override 
>> Stem.details.beamed-lengths = #'(3.5) \acciaccatura d'8 c <e, g b> <e g 
>> c>}>> |
>> }
>> 
>> Anyway I was just curious on that.
>> 
>> Oh  I tried the fonts out, I am a big fan of font that looks hand written. 
>> So I really liked   
>> improviso.ily. I have used jazzlily for a long time and was wondering has it 
>> been updated since before?
>> 
>> anyway 
>> 
>> Thanks again
> 
> LilyJAZZ has *definitely* been updated. I've added numerous elements, 
> including articulations, microtonal accidentals, scripts, harmonics, etc. 
> It's quite complete now. It has also been updated in that it is used without 
> any fancy coding hacks :) Just do like you did with Improviso and use the 
> LilyJAZZ stylesheet via
> 
> \include "LilyJAZZ.ily"
> 
> or manually,
> 
> \paper {
>   #(define fonts
>     (set-global-fonts
>     #:music "lilyjazz"
>     #:brace "lilyjazz"
>     #:roman "LilyJAZZText"
>     #:sans "LilyJAZZChords"
>     #:factor (/ staff-height pt 20)
>     ))
> }
> 
> in your score and you should be good to go!
> 
> Regards,
> Abraham
> 
> View this message in context: RE:Slur and acciaccatura in chords
> Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to