Federico Bruni <fedel...@gmail.com> writes: > 2014-12-23 16:31 GMT+01:00 Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca>: > >> Hi all, >> >> >> I'd personally avoid using stopStaff for codas. >> >> Creating a new score for the coda is much easier >> > >> > definitely a better idea, thanks >> > it's worth adding it to the LSR? >> >> It’s probably worth adding to the LSR… >> >> But I strongly disagree with the suggestion that it’s a "better solution”: >> it divides a single musical “piece” (work, expression, whatever) into two >> separate scores just to accomplish an engraving issue which should be as >> easy as using \repeat volta. Now everything (e.g., parts, midi, etc.) >> requires double-scoring or recombining of variables, etc. >> >> There’s a better way — we should try to make it happen. >> >> > Do we have an issue for this? > This is the only one I could find: > https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3752 > > and I'm not sure what it really intends to do...
Have a \repeat coda command for repeats with coda, and a \repeat fine command for repeats with fine. I thought that was obvious. If you find that the problem description is deficient, please add a comment to the issue. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
