On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:39 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Loïc Minier <loic.min...@linaro.org> wrote: > > Hey there > > > > As a result of a series of bugs around linaro-image-tools and daily > > images, it seemed a sensible approach to solve this class of issues > > would be to move more data into hardware packs rather than hardcoding > > stuff in linaro-image-tools. > > yes, the idea was always to have all hw dependent stuff shipped inside > the hwpacks. So moving things that are board specific from l-m-c > scripts to hwpacks meta data/configs is in line with that. So +1 from > me on moving forward on these. > > Please try to preserve the ability to use old hwpacks though.
Definitely; this is why the hwpacks are versioned. It will require some extra code in l-m-c to handle them differently, but I wasn't considering breaking l-m-c for old hwpacks. -- Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
