On 06/03/2011 07:04 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Nicolas Pitre<nicolas.pi...@linaro.org> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
in or should we plan on a LT/BSP kernel for full functionality. I
presume if those patches were headed upstream they would be headed
upstream:). If not they they should not be in linux-linaro.
This is the strategy of this game. If it isn't going upstream you lose.
In practice this means that AndyDoan/Ricardo will have to do their work
again on top of this tree, and then I might merge it.
Yup, that's the plan.
I believe Rob Clark is targeting the DRM changes for OMAP for 3.1, so
I'll check with him and rebase the patches to be in a better shape for
upstream.
Once done will send the pull request to Nicolas.
I wish we could coordinate this a bit better somehow.
I was wandering around rebasing the DSS stuff I have and trying to get
something other than 640 x 480 coming on mainline 2.6.39 the last couple
of days; I also saw these new DSS build failures in npitre .39 build.
I can see Ricardo is better plugged into the source of these DSS patches
than I am and has more experience working on them. But we have some
related endeavours ongoing via Jassi's work uplevelling video decode
stuff and trying to get workable SGX / PVR integrated.
Does it not make sense to put these patches into LT tree first where it
can play alongside whatever other patches are flying around?
Anyway linus HEAD on Panda is otherwise quite nice now, the bluetooth
stuff is in there already, WLAN is working well and so on. DSS stuff is
still a WIP though.
-Andy
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
