On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:48:26 -0700 Bernhard Rosenkranzer <bernhard.rosenkran...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 10 August 2011 09:20, Vladimir Pantelic <vlado...@gmail.com> wrote: > > fwiw, android GB and HC both build fine on 32 bit here... > > How so? Did you simply patch out the > > ifeq ($(BUILD_OS),linux) > build_arch := $(shell uname -m) > ifneq (64,$(findstring 64,$(build_arch))) > $(warning > ************************************************************) > $(warning You are attempting to build on a 32-bit system.) $(warning > Only 64-bit build environments are supported beyond froyo/2.2.) > $(warning > ************************************************************) $(error > stop) endif endif > > part of build/core/main.mk? (I never understood why they put it there, > but never bothered to question it and patch it out). I personally did. I understand that what comes out is nothing official, but it helps to at least look at non-related build issues. I don't have strong opinion on whether we should switch for Linaro builds, but would like to see stronger motivation than "it might be slightly faster" ;-). There're in particular bunch of ideas how to make android-build quicker, but going for them w/o actual benchmarking might be waste of time or lead to adverse effects... > > ttyl > bero > -- Best Regards, Paul Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev