Hi -
At the moment the Mali T624 OOT module sources I have do not build
against 3.9-rcX / linux-linaro-core-tracking. A colleague checked it
and it does build against 3.4. The problems I saw are around ION
compatibility but they didn't look tremendously bad.
I could work around the problems myself, but it seems to me this might
be something that Linaro could solve centrally, dealing with it using
the Androidization model - sync a Linaro repo against code drops coming
from "upstream", ie, ARM, but keep it always building against llct
inbetween. Perhaps even inside llct.
I know we're not the only LT in this boat, Anmar mentioned Arndale
acceleration is pending, a central Mali-ization tree will also solve
that, especially if it's always there and always building in llct already.
There may be stuff to take care about for support for different IP
revision. But there aren't that many AFAIK.
How does this sound to folks?
-Andy
--
Andy Green | Fujitsu Landing Team Leader
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs | Follow Linaro
http://facebook.com/pages/Linaro/155974581091106 -
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://linaro.org/linaro-blog
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
