On 5 August 2013 10:44, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <t...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 17:13 +0800, Andy Green wrote: >
> > The whole list is good things to have I just wonder how ongoing > > updates will be handled for backport. For example at some point > > "Tweaks to the MCPM code which aren't upstream." will go upstream and > > probably be a bit different by then, someone should "revert" (it may > > not be that clean since other patches may have meddled) the old one in > > lsk and "replace" with the upstream patches. Mark's watching out for > > that, or you are for the trees you merged that went into LSK, or > > what's the plan? > > Plan? There's no plan that I know of. As was mentioned on linaro-kernel the plan is that you should be sending me incremental updates as needed. I'm not monitoring everything that goes upstream, especially in this case where I didn't get a breakdown of what went in there or topic branches for the vexpress enablement so I've very little visibility of what's there.
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
