Hi

On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 at 04:07, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks, Maxim!
>
> > If we can't get it fixed and the bot green by Wednesday, we'll move it to
> staging.  Sounds good?
>
> This sounds good.
> I know how frustrating it could be to follow a chain of bugs and issues
> screening each other.
>
> Though, longer a builder remains red - less trust developers have to its
> reliability - less attention they pay - more problems gets introduced -
> longer the builder in question remains broken. This is a catch 22, and this
> chain of events must be stopped somewhere. If this is important to you
> builder, maybe it is possible to add more workers to it to reduce the blame
> lists? I assume it couldn't be built faster. Or assign someone to check the
> failures, bisect, and escalate quickly? The first option seems more
> feasible, I guess...
>
> Please let me know if I could help.
>

I've disabled the test for AArch64 while we are investigating the real
issue with it,
the bot should be green again in 2hrs... Hopefully!

Yvan



>
> Galina
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 3:07 AM Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > > On Mar 13, 2021, at 11:03 AM, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Linaro Toolchain Working Group,
> >
> > Hi Galina,
> >
> > >
> > > Please connect your new bots to the staging first and make them
> reliably
> > > green there:
> > >
> > > linaro-aarch64-flang-debug
> > > linaro-aarch64-flang-latest-clang
> > > linaro-aarch64-flang-latest-gcc
> >
> > We had these reliably green when connected to our internal testing
> > buildmaster, but it's a good idea to let them cook for a week or two in
> > upstream staging buildmaster anyway.
> >
> > >
> > > clang-cmake-aarch64-full is red for a month.
> > > https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/7?numbuilds=700
> > >
> > > Could you move linaro-aarch64-full to the staging and make it green
> > again,
> > > please?
> >
> > Clang-cmake-aarch64-full is one of our most important (if not the most
> > important) bot, and we pay constant attention to it.  It has been red
> for a
> > month, but only due to various patches actually breaking bits and pieces
> of
> > LLVM for AArch64.  We ping patch authors promptly, and give them a few
> days
> > to correct the problems they caused before reverting their patches
> > ourselves.
> >
> > At the moment the last and only failure in clang-cmake-aarch64-full is
> > FAIL: AddressSanitizer-aarch64-linux-dynamic::fgets_fputs.cpp
> > which we are investigating.  If we can't get it fixed and the bot green
> by
> > Wednesday, we'll move it to staging.  Sounds good?
> >
> > >
> > > Please let me know if I could help or you have questions.
> > >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Maxim Kuvyrkov
> > https://www.linaro.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> linaro-toolchain mailing list
> linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
>
_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Reply via email to