> On Mar 16, 2021, at 6:06 AM, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks, Maxim! > > > If we can't get it fixed and the bot green by Wednesday, we'll move it to > > staging. Sounds good? > > This sounds good. > I know how frustrating it could be to follow a chain of bugs and issues > screening each other. > > Though, longer a builder remains red - less trust developers have to its > reliability - less attention they pay - more problems gets introduced - > longer the builder in question remains broken. This is a catch 22, and this > chain of events must be stopped somewhere. If this is important to you > builder, maybe it is possible to add more workers to it to reduce the blame > lists? I assume it couldn't be built faster. Or assign someone to check the > failures, bisect, and escalate quickly? The first option seems more feasible, > I guess...
Hi Galina, We are expecting new more powerful machines for our buildbots in few weeks time. Builds should become faster by around 50%. -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > Please let me know if I could help. > > Galina > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 3:07 AM Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org> > wrote: > > > On Mar 13, 2021, at 11:03 AM, Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello Linaro Toolchain Working Group, > > Hi Galina, > > > > > Please connect your new bots to the staging first and make them reliably > > green there: > > > > linaro-aarch64-flang-debug > > linaro-aarch64-flang-latest-clang > > linaro-aarch64-flang-latest-gcc > > We had these reliably green when connected to our internal testing > buildmaster, but it's a good idea to let them cook for a week or two in > upstream staging buildmaster anyway. > > > > > clang-cmake-aarch64-full is red for a month. > > https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/7?numbuilds=700 > > > > Could you move linaro-aarch64-full to the staging and make it green again, > > please? > > Clang-cmake-aarch64-full is one of our most important (if not the most > important) bot, and we pay constant attention to it. It has been red for a > month, but only due to various patches actually breaking bits and pieces of > LLVM for AArch64. We ping patch authors promptly, and give them a few days > to correct the problems they caused before reverting their patches ourselves. > > At the moment the last and only failure in clang-cmake-aarch64-full is > FAIL: AddressSanitizer-aarch64-linux-dynamic::fgets_fputs.cpp > which we are investigating. If we can't get it fixed and the bot green by > Wednesday, we'll move it to staging. Sounds good? > > > > > Please let me know if I could help or you have questions. > > > > Regards, > > -- > Maxim Kuvyrkov > https://www.linaro.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
