On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 4:12 AM H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 3:49 AM Adhemerval Zanella Netto
> <adhemerval.zane...@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 15/02/24 08:47, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:01 AM Maxim Kuvyrkov
> > > <maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On Feb 15, 2024, at 03:54, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> FAIL: elf/tst-gnu2-tls2
> > >>>
> > >>> indicates that your _dl_tlsdesc_dynamic may not preserve all 
> > >>> caller-saved
> > >>> registers.  Please find out how the test fails.
> > >>
> > >> Hi H.J.,
> > >>
> > >> See below.
> > >>
> > >> ...
> > >>> FAIL: 1 regressions
> > >>>
> > >>> regressions.sum:
> > >>>                === glibc tests ===
> > >>>
> > >>> Running glibc:elf ...
> > >>> FAIL: elf/tst-gnu2-tls2
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
> > >>> - 
> > >>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/1460/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/00-sumfiles/
> > >>
> > >> tests.log.1.xz contains output of failed tests --
> > >> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/1460/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/00-sumfiles/tests.log.1.xz
> > >> ===
> > >> FAIL: elf/tst-gnu2-tls2
> > >> original exit status 1
> > >> open tst-gnu2-tls2mod0.so
> > >> open tst-gnu2-tls2mod1.so
> > >> open tst-gnu2-tls2mod2.so
> > >> close tst-gnu2-tls2mod0.so
> > >> close tst-gnu2-tls2mod1.so
> > >> open tst-gnu2-tls2mod0.so
> > >> open tst-gnu2-tls2mod1.so
> > >> Didn't expect signal from child: got `Segmentation fault'
> > >> ===
> > >>
> > >> Let me know if you need any help investigating this.
> > >>
> > >
> > > I don't have access to aarch64 machine which can build glibc.
> > > Please configure glibc with --enable-hardcoded-path-in-tests
> > > and run elf/tst-gnu2-tls2 under GDB to find out what is going
> > > on.
> > >
> >
> > I will check this out H.J.
>
> Does your _dl_tlsdesc_dynamic save ALL caller-saved registers,
> except for the return value register?  I saw
>
>         stp      x5,  x6, [sp, #16*1]
>         stp      x7,  x8, [sp, #16*2]
>         stp      x9, x10, [sp, #16*3]
>         stp     x11, x12, [sp, #16*4]
>         stp     x13, x14, [sp, #16*5]
>         stp     x15, x16, [sp, #16*6]
>         stp     x17, x18, [sp, #16*7]
>
> Do you need to save x1 to x4?
>
> --
> H.J.

If your processor is also impacted, please add it to

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31372

-- 
H.J.
_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org

Reply via email to