Hi Kevin,

This is false-positive report -- see 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31575 for details.

--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
https://www.linaro.org

> On Mar 29, 2024, at 10:48, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote:
> 
> Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your 
> patch(es).  Please find some details below.  If you have any questions, 
> please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's 
> #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on 
> the usual project channel.
> 
> We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or 
> reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI 
> within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help.
> 
> In gdb_check master-arm after:
> 
>  | gdb patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/87793
>  | Author: Kevin Buettner <kev...@redhat.com>
>  | Date:   Thu Mar 28 15:53:14 2024 -0700
>  | 
>  |     New test: gdb.base/check-errno.exp
>  |     
>  |     Printing the value of 'errno' from GDB is sometimes problematic.  The
>  |     situation has improved in recent years, though there are still
>  |     scenarios for which "print errno" doesn't work.
>  |     
>  |     The test, gdb.base/check-errno.exp, introduced by this commit,
>  | ... 174 lines of the commit log omitted.
>  | ... applied on top of baseline commit:
>  | 1678a15b694 Automatic date update in version.in
> 
> FAIL: 7 regressions: 16 progressions
> 
> regressions.sum:
> === gdb tests ===
> 
> Running gdb:gdb.ada/verylong.exp ...
> FAIL: gdb.ada/verylong.exp: print (x / 4) * 2
> FAIL: gdb.ada/verylong.exp: print +x
> FAIL: gdb.ada/verylong.exp: print -x
> FAIL: gdb.ada/verylong.exp: print x
> FAIL: gdb.ada/verylong.exp: print x - 99 + 1
> FAIL: gdb.ada/verylong.exp: print x / 2
> FAIL: gdb.ada/verylong.exp: print x = 170141183460469231731687303715884105727
> ... and 1 more entries
> 
> progressions.sum:
> === gdb tests ===
> 
> Running gdb:gdb.ada/convvar_comp.exp ...
> FAIL: gdb.ada/convvar_comp.exp: print item.started
> FAIL: gdb.ada/convvar_comp.exp: set variable $item := item
> FAIL: gdb.ada/convvar_comp.exp: print $item.started
> 
> Running gdb:gdb.ada/enum_idx_packed.exp ...
> FAIL: gdb.ada/enum_idx_packed.exp: scenario=minimal: print small
> FAIL: gdb.ada/enum_idx_packed.exp: scenario=minimal: print multi
> ... and 18 more entries
> 
> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
> - 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/2028/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/00-sumfiles/
> The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make 
> commands are in
> - 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/2028/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/notify/
> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
> - 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/2028/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/sumfiles/xfails.xfail
> 
> The configuration of this build is:
> CI config tcwg_gdb_check master-arm
> 
> -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
> The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment:
> 
> Current build   : 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/2028/artifact/artifacts
> Reference build : 
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-build/984/artifact/artifacts
> 
> Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update
> generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the
> master files.


_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org

Reply via email to