Hi Christina, This is false-positive report -- see https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31575 for details.
-- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Mar 29, 2024, at 10:22, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your > patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, > please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's > #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on > the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or > reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI > within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > In gdb_check master-arm after: > > | gdb patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/87686 > | Author: Christina Schimpe <christina.schi...@intel.com> > | Date: Wed Mar 27 07:47:37 2024 +0000 > | > | gdb: Make tagged pointer support configurable. > | > | The gdbarch function gdbarch_remove_non_address_bits adjusts addresses > to > | enable debugging of programs with tagged pointers on Linux, for > instance for > | ARM's feature top byte ignore (TBI). > | Once the function is implemented for an architecture, it adjusts > addresses for > | memory access, breakpoints and watchpoints. > | ... 12 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 1678a15b694 Automatic date update in version.in > > FAIL: 7 regressions: 16 progressions > > regressions.sum: > === gdb tests === > > Running gdb:gdb.ada/verylong.exp ... > FAIL: gdb.ada/verylong.exp: print (x / 4) * 2 > FAIL: gdb.ada/verylong.exp: print +x > FAIL: gdb.ada/verylong.exp: print -x > FAIL: gdb.ada/verylong.exp: print x > FAIL: gdb.ada/verylong.exp: print x - 99 + 1 > FAIL: gdb.ada/verylong.exp: print x / 2 > FAIL: gdb.ada/verylong.exp: print x = 170141183460469231731687303715884105727 > ... and 1 more entries > > progressions.sum: > === gdb tests === > > Running gdb:gdb.ada/convvar_comp.exp ... > FAIL: gdb.ada/convvar_comp.exp: print $item.started > FAIL: gdb.ada/convvar_comp.exp: print item.started > FAIL: gdb.ada/convvar_comp.exp: set variable $item := item > > Running gdb:gdb.ada/enum_idx_packed.exp ... > FAIL: gdb.ada/enum_idx_packed.exp: scenario=minimal: print small > FAIL: gdb.ada/enum_idx_packed.exp: scenario=minimal: print multi_multi(1,3) > ... and 18 more entries > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/2024/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/00-sumfiles/ > The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make > commands are in > - > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/2024/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/notify/ > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/2024/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/sumfiles/xfails.xfail > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gdb_check master-arm > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/2024/artifact/artifacts > Reference build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-build/984/artifact/artifacts > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files. _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
