I moved to Lincoln the year the school construction was added to my taxes.  I 
am not looking forward to the same increase for another huge project.  
I would love to see less expensive options discussed and proposed-or is the $25 
million already approved and waiting to be spent?

Carol Bickford 

> On Oct 25, 2022, at 6:00 PM, sally kindleberger <skindleber...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> Many of us have been waiting and/or working on the development of a community 
> center for over 10 years.  We supported the new school construction even 
> though we have no children in our schools! And we willingly paid higher taxes 
> for the betterment of the whole community.
> Many of the surrounding towns have incredible community centers - much bigger 
> and fancier than what is proposed for Lincoln! 
> One must note that this building will be ear-marked for the entire town - the 
> COA and Human Services and the Recreation department will be 
> housed there and other groups in town will make good use of it.
> I feel strongly that the town should support the construction of a community 
> center!  And I hope that I will live to see it.
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 5:34 PM Seth Rosen <rosen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I agree with you, Sara.  I don’t think we should make that investment, and 
>> instead I feel we should revisit all of our needs, prioritize them based on 
>> urgency and impact, and then debate various alternatives that comport with 
>> current economic realities and resource constraints.
>> 
>>>> On Oct 25, 2022, at 5:10 PM, Sara Mattes <samat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>> Simple question-why would we approve the $325,000 to finalize designs if 
>>> we questioned the financial wisdom of the final investment of $25 million?
>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Sara Mattes
>>> ------
>>> Sara Mattes
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Oct 25, 2022, at 2:17 PM, Seth Rosen <rosen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Friends and Neighbors - 
>>>> 
>>>> I've recently become more informed on this particular issue, and share a 
>>>> lot of the concerns articulated below.  The below information was compiled 
>>>> by a group of very diligent and thoughtful neighbors whose opinions I 
>>>> respect. I volunteered to send it along to LincolnTalk.
>>>> 
>>>> If you have feelings on this issue, and are concerned about a potential 
>>>> ~9% property tax increase to fund it, please make your voice heard on 
>>>> November 30th.  
>>>> 
>>>> The Background
>>>> 
>>>> In May of 2022, a proposal was approved at Town Meeting to establish a 
>>>> Committee to explore the construction of a Community Center. The major 
>>>> goal for the Community Center is to house the Council on Aging, in other 
>>>> words, to operate as a senior center. At that time, the cost of this 
>>>> Community Center was estimated at $25MM. This cost would be paid from our 
>>>> property taxes.
>>>> 
>>>> On November 14th the Committee will provide more details on the two 
>>>> designs presented in May and ask residents to approve $325,000 to hire an 
>>>> architect to finalize both designs and put them to a vote at the Special 
>>>> Town Meeting on November 30th.
>>>> 
>>>> While we want to provide seniors with a facility that meets their needs, 
>>>> we believe the two very similar designs envisioned by the Committee are 
>>>> not the right path forward. The details are spelled out below, but 
>>>> basically:
>>>> 
>>>> -       They are too expensive, out of proportion to our needs and means. 
>>>> Your property taxes will go up thousands of dollars a year, forever, 
>>>> making our town even more unaffordable for many residents.
>>>> 
>>>> -       Town’s finances are already stretched after the completion of the 
>>>> school building and will be further compromised by unavoidable incremental 
>>>> expenses and capital investments.
>>>> 
>>>> -       There are better and cheaper ways to achieve the same goals. They 
>>>> should be investigated before moving ahead with a final design.
>>>> 
>>>> What can you do? First, learn more about this. There is low awareness of 
>>>> this project and its consequences, but in our experience when folks are 
>>>> debriefed on the matter, most agree with our take. Read below for more 
>>>> detailed information about the costs and alternatives, and please do not 
>>>> hesitate to get in touch if you have questions (email 
>>>> lincolnccquesti...@gmail.com). Second, come to the Special Town Meeting in 
>>>> the Donaldson Auditorium on November 30th at 7:30pm, and vote against the 
>>>> proposal to spend another $325,000 to fund additional work on this design.
>>>> 
>>>> The current proposal is disproportionate to our needs and would make our 
>>>> town even more unaffordable for young families and retired seniors. Our 
>>>> estimate is that the construction and manning of the Center would increase 
>>>> the average property tax bill by $1,700. We can both provide our seniors 
>>>> the services they need, and avoid financial hardship in our community.
>>>> 
>>>> Its financial impact has been materially understated
>>>> 
>>>> The preliminary financial impact presented at Town Meeting in May is not 
>>>> an accurate representation of the financial burden the Community Center 
>>>> will impose on our town:
>>>> 
>>>> ·       The 3% interest rate discussed at the time would be over 4% today. 
>>>> This alone would increase the debt service cost by 20%.
>>>> ·       The alternatives presented last year ranged between $23MM and 
>>>> $25.4MM. We can use $25MM to calculate the debt service. Using the updated 
>>>> interest rate, annual debt service would be ~$1.5MM.
>>>> ·       We do not want to get bogged down on this debate, but we would 
>>>> just note that the inflation expectations used at the time are looking 
>>>> very optimistic. The cost estimate increased an average 10% every year 
>>>> between the initial estimate of 2018 and the update in 2021, but are only 
>>>> projected to grow 3.5% per year over the next four despite a much higher 
>>>> overall inflation background.
>>>> ·       There was no estimation of the operating budget of this new 
>>>> facility. A good rule of thumb for a public building is to assume 2% 
>>>> annual maintenance ($500,000), on top of that we assume $100,000 in 
>>>> utilities expense, 0.5% insurance cost ($150,000), perhaps an additional 
>>>> $300,000 for 3-4 FTEs (janitors and personnel for new services provided) 
>>>> and another $50,000 in sundry expenses like new capital equipment and 
>>>> consumables. This would represent a cost increase of ~$1.1MM per year, 
>>>> growing at the rate of inflation.
>>>> 
>>>> A $2.6MM annual expense would represent an increase of approximately 9% 
>>>> versus the FY22 tax levy, $1,700 in incremental property tax for the 
>>>> average property owner. This is simply unacceptable at a time in our town 
>>>> when we are discussing options of how to reduce the financial burden for 
>>>> seniors living on a fixed income. Lincoln families already pay the 
>>>> third-highest property tax bills in Massachusetts. 
>>>> https://www.mass.gov/info-details/fy2022-massachusetts-average-single-family-tax
>>>>  Property taxes in our town are already more onerous, defined as a 
>>>> percentage of our income, than our neighbors and peers’. 
>>>> https://dlsgateway.dor.state.ma.us/reports/rdPage.aspx?rdReport=AverageSingleTaxBill.SingleFamTaxBill_wRange
>>>> 
>>>> Dire straits directly ahead
>>>> 
>>>> The town faces a difficult next few years financially as the following 
>>>> incremental expenses, to be accomplished through increases in the tax 
>>>> levy, are likely to require overrides
>>>> 
>>>> ·       Teacher salaries, which are by far the town’s greatest expense, 
>>>> have been frozen for the past two years and their contract is up for 
>>>> negotiation this fiscal year.
>>>> ·       The last inflation read was 8.2%, including a 6.6% increase in 
>>>> core inflation. The town will have to make tough decisions regarding 
>>>> resource prioritization to keep fiscal balances in check and retain talent.
>>>> ·       There are several other non-discretionary capital investments in 
>>>> the horizon, including a road maintenance plan and a new DPW facility, 
>>>> which would be jeopardized if we moved ahead with this project.
>>>> ·       Last year we received a one-off $2MM from the American Rescue 
>>>> Plan. We should not expect this type of largesse in the future.
>>>> 
>>>> As most of you know, the town has a very small commercial tax base and an 
>>>> insignificant amount of new single-family house construction to lighten 
>>>> the burden on existing property owners. The current economic consensus is 
>>>> that the U.S. economy is heading into a recession. It would be highly 
>>>> imprudent to increase our leverage and spending in this macroeconomic 
>>>> environment.
>>>> 
>>>> We have great alternatives
>>>> 
>>>> The town already has enough space to host senior activities, we just need 
>>>> to be more open-minded in our approach. We believe that converting Pierce 
>>>> House into the town’s COA headquarters would address all of the concerns 
>>>> associated with Bemis Hall as presented in the 2018 Planning report. To be 
>>>> precise, there would be plentiful parking, easy accessibility and enough 
>>>> rooms to both provide services that require confidentiality and conduct 
>>>> group activities.
>>>> 
>>>> Pierce House is an idyllic location right at the center of town that needs 
>>>> to be maintained into perpetuity. This new mission would set it much 
>>>> closer to the Pierce family’s original gift intentions (community health) 
>>>> than its current use as a wedding facility. We suspect that many neighbors 
>>>> would be very happy with the accompanying noise reduction and we would 
>>>> avoid doubling down on the existing traffic congestion at the school’s 
>>>> campus.
>>>> 
>>>> There is no shortage of currently underutilized public buildings in town 
>>>> which could compliment Pierce House to provide additional space for the 
>>>> COA and community groups. The Town Building is very large for a town our 
>>>> size (the same size as Weston with less than half the population) and 
>>>> Hartwell could definitely see heavier use with a more rational floorplan. 
>>>> We should also reconsider upgrading Bemis Hall.
>>>> 
>>>> Other than housing COA activities, it is not entirely clear what benefits 
>>>> the Community Center would provide the town. By its own admission, the 
>>>> Parks and Recreation department is happy with the pod where they are 
>>>> currently located. There will almost certainly be a need to revamp the 
>>>> pods or find alternative accommodations at some point in the near future, 
>>>> but we should not let the tail wag the dog.
>>>> 
>>>> A palatial structure out of proportion with our needs and our peers
>>>> 
>>>> The current Community Center proposal is for a 23,500 sqft facility, which 
>>>> is out of proportion with the size of our town and our senior population:
>>>> 
>>>> ·       Most neighboring towns, all of them more populous than us (pop. 
>>>> 4,771 excluding Hanscom), do not have a separate Community Center. Wayland 
>>>> (pop. 13,724), Bedford (14,155), Carlisle (5,181) and Harvard (6,844) fall 
>>>> in that list.
>>>> ·       Concord, with almost four times our population, has a 18,000 sqft 
>>>> Community Center, which also houses its pre-school.
>>>> ·       Sudbury, which has a population also almost four times ours, has a 
>>>> project to build a new facility. The space allocated to their senior 
>>>> center is 5,754 sqft.
>>>> ·       Weston, is a wealthier town with more than twice the seniors (65+) 
>>>> and total population, has a slightly smaller (22,500 sqft), much more 
>>>> modest architecturally facility.
>>>> ·       Even Newton, with a population 18 times ours, is projecting a 
>>>> cheaper Senior Center ($19.5MM).
>>>> ·       The envisioned cost per square foot of our Center, which would 
>>>> surpass $1,000 per square foot, speaks to a lavish facility, more suited 
>>>> to an international conference center than a small town’s senior center.
>>>> ·       Pierce House has a finished square footage of 5,306, perfect for 
>>>> our needs.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>>> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
>>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>> 
>>> 
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> 
> -- 
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
> 
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to