The HCAWG has had many meetings that have been open and are available on video.
I believe if you go to the town website, you can find them.
Citizens comments and questions are there too.
http://www.lincolntown.org/1327/Housing-Choice-Act-Working-Group

I do not believe there to be deception.
I believe everyone is trying to do what they believe is best for the town.
There are a lot of different opinions about what that is.
Some of those opinions are expressed with great passion.

As the saying goes…it’s complicated.


------
Sara Mattes




> On Nov 6, 2023, at 6:54 PM, Garrick Niemiec <garrickniemiec...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Why is the town not explaining this to the town...why the deception 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2023, 4:06 PM Sara Mattes <samat...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:samat...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Once rezone with the HCA, the property owner can put up pretty much whatever 
>> they want.
>> That is the point of the HCA-to get around our normal process for managing 
>> development in Lincoln.
>> No proposals are required for the town to see.
>> The development is BY RIGHT, they just need to comply with some very basic 
>> zoning-wetlands setbacks, other set backs, etc.
>> 
>> And, as was made clear in a public presentation, dense housing is the most 
>> profitable use of the land, not retail.
>> 
>> The discussion about the Mall is confusing as concepts were discussed and 
>> proposals were to be offered at a later date.
>> In addition, the RLF said they were looking to most lily sell and were in 
>> discussion with a local developer-CIVICO.
>> Regardless of what is discussed now, as it stands now, once rezoned the 
>> owner, either the RLF but most like a new owner, can do whatever they see 
>> fit with that land.
>> 
>> That is why this is all so difficult and generating so much debate.
>> 
>> It is important that we all learn as much as possible and attend each and 
>> every meeting to better understand what is being proposed and what is at 
>> stake.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ------
>> Sara Mattes
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 6, 2023, at 1:43 PM, Deborah Greenwald <deborah.greenw...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:deborah.greenw...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear All,
>>> I would very much like to have David's proposals included in our vote. He 
>>> And are we taking bids from multiple developers? Some might be more 
>>> amenable to more low income units.
>>> To me it seems that considering any development near Codman Farm is akin to 
>>> building an apartment building on the Boston Public Gardens or Concord's 
>>> Monument Square. That area is one of Lincoln's jewels and should be 
>>> preserved.
>>> On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 10:01 PM David Cuetos <davidcue...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:davidcue...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> I have received some questions from residents trying to understand why our 
>>>> HCA proposals overlay zoning over existing multi-family districts. I 
>>>> thought the rationale was important enough to share it with the wider 
>>>> public.
>>>> 
>>>> I believe the town would be better served by separating as much as 
>>>> possible the zoning exercise required for compliance approval from actual 
>>>> development. Zoning existing multifamily developments accomplishes that 
>>>> goal, as those properties already have the characteristics we would like 
>>>> to see and they are unlikely to be redeveloped. Let me explain the logic 
>>>> behind the separation.
>>>> 
>>>> HCA compliance requires us to zone a certain number of acres to a certain 
>>>> density by right. What that means is that as long as the developer does 
>>>> not go past our height and setback bylaws, they do not need to ask the 
>>>> town for feedback. This is not what historically happened in Lincoln. 
>>>> Historically every multi-family development was a give and take between 
>>>> the developer and the town. In that process the town was able to extract 
>>>> important concessions like the number of affordable units, measures to 
>>>> reduce environmental impact, etc.
>>>> 
>>>> While that give and take was quite important, for areas rezoned under HCA 
>>>> the town's influence is diminished even further as developers would get an 
>>>> override over certain town bylaws the State considers too restrictive. 
>>>> Among them two are chief: affordability and wetland setbacks. The state 
>>>> will only allow us to ask a developer to include 10% affordable units. The 
>>>> town’s bylaws require 15%, and historically the town has never approved 
>>>> anything below 25%, including some units reserved for low income 
>>>> households. 25% is also the lowest percentage of units for an entire 
>>>> development to count towards 40B State requirements. The other requirement 
>>>> at odds is wetlands setback. The town’s bylaws require 100’ and the State 
>>>> only gives us 50’. This difference would be critical in some sensitive 
>>>> areas like Codman Rd.
>>>> 
>>>> Our view is that it is detrimental to the town’s general interest to allow 
>>>> a developer to build a large multifamily building without going through 
>>>> town meeting approval. The success of Oriole Landing is testament to the 
>>>> usefulness of town meeting: a win-win for the town and the developer. We 
>>>> have actually learned from other towns like Winchester that we can drive a 
>>>> much tougher bargain than we have done in the past.
>>>> 
>>>> We see with skepticism claims that the Oriole Landing developer, who made 
>>>> an estimated $12M profit and was able to get through town meeting in nine 
>>>> months, does not want to go through town meeting again. Lincoln has 
>>>> historically not been an obstructive town towards multi-family developers 
>>>> and there is no reason to think that would change now that HCA has lowered 
>>>> Town Meeting approval thresholds from 2/3 to just a simple majority.
>>>> 
>>>> I ask all residents to consider that when they vote to rezone an area, 
>>>> they are de facto abdicating their democratic right to influence future 
>>>> development.
>>>> 
>>>> David Cuetos
>>>> Weston Rd
>>>> -- 
>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org 
>>>> <mailto:Lincoln@lincolntalk.org>.
>>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org 
>>> <mailto:Lincoln@lincolntalk.org>.
>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org 
>> <mailto:Lincoln@lincolntalk.org>.
>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> 

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to