I'm working in 7 at the moment, but although I understand how bitOr works,
most non-CS people probably wouldn't. I also know I can make my own little
function (that's what I'm doing), but I realized that most languages have
either a trunc/integer pair, or an integer/round pair, and we have neither
- just plain old integer.
Anyway, it's not a huge deal, just one more enhancement...
- Tab
At 02:48 PM 10/9/00 -0400, Colin Holgate wrote:
>>If it makes you feel any better, "truncX=bitOr(x,0)" is a little bit
>>faster. Furthermore it works with negative integers, which your formula
>>doesn't. Ofcourse it's a D8 command and it's not that much faster,
>>really. 13-14% or something. But I think trunc() would probably be just
>>this much faster if it was built in. ;-)
>
>It may be a D8 command, but it also works in D7.02.
>
>
>[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
>http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
>email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
>
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
