What's the benefit?  Why not just always use halt?  I've been doing it for 
years - no problems.  I'm not sure why you're going through the trouble to 
differentiate.

At 09:57 AM 6/13/01 -0400, Al Hospers wrote:
> > Actually, a better way out is to use 'halt'.
> >
> > In authoring mode (that is, in Director), quit will also exit
> > Director,
> > which makes it really annoying for testing.  By using 'halt'
> > instead, the
> > movie will just stop.
>
>to cover both authoring & runtime modes I have found that this works well.
>use this code as a behavior on your Exit button:
>
>  on mouseUp me
>
>   smartQuit
>
>  end
>
>then place this code as a movie script in your movie:
>
>  on smartQuit
>
>   if the runMode <> "Author" then
>    QUIT
>   else
>    HALT
>   end if
>
>  end
>
>
>the reason for the distinction is that QUIT will cause the Director
>authoring environment to close, which is not what you want when testing.
>
>hope this helps
>
>Al Hospers
>CamberSoft, Inc.
>al<at>cambersoft<dot>com
>http://www.cambersoft.com
>
>A famous linguist once said:
>"There is no language wherein a double
>positive can form a negative."
>
>YEAH, RIGHT
>
>
>
>[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
>http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list,
>email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]


[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]

Reply via email to