> > interesting thread. I haven't really thought about some of these > baseline issues in a while. > I think OOP is only just coming of age - its only now that us "normal" programmers start hashing out the issues. This is a particularly interesting thread because Director isn't locked into any real OOP metaphors yet. Pete [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Brennan Young
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers
- Re: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Pete Carss
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers
- Re: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor ac... Pete Carss
- Re: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor ac... Christian Wach
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancest... Al Hospers
- <lingo-l> pacth Daniel Campos
- RE: <lingo-l> pacth Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> pacth Al Hospers
- Re: <lingo-l> pacth Daniel Campos
- RE: <lingo-l> pacth Colin Kettenacker
- RE: <lingo-l> pacth Al Hospers
- <lingo-l> I SEARCHED... the nightboy
- Re: <lingo-l> I SEAR... Buzz Kettles