Damn, I take that back, Each letter was individually addressed. > On 2016/Aug/13, at 10:08 AM, Kim Holburn <[email protected]> wrote: > > That would mean, surely that census workers would have to deliver the right > envelope to the right address. I'm sure that would leave a paper trail. > They could have done it electronically, ie with a census worker's device and > some kind of identifying mark on the outside of the envelope. > > Anyone got their envelopes? > >> On 2016/Aug/12, at 2:22 PM, Roger Clarke <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The following has been suggested to me: >> >> 1. The association between the 12-digit number and the dwelling-adress >> may have been systematically assigned rather than purely random >
-- Kim Holburn IT Network & Security Consultant T: +61 2 61402408 M: +61 404072753 mailto:[email protected] aim://kimholburn skype://kholburn - PGP Public Key on request _______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
