Thanks for mentioning a possibility like this, but does this handle frontpage components correctly? For example, if one department *click click* inserted a form to submit email, frontpage inserts embeded comments that are interpreted by the server extensions. Same with counters, and other things that frontpage provides to make things as painless as possible for Joe User.
I thought any pages with <!--webbot bot=" utilize various frontpage server binaries and will malfunction without server extensions installed. Or is your experience different? ~ Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>On our company intranet webserver, various departments maintain their >>own pages. Most utilize front page and front page publishing >>features, >>which unfortunately require front page server extensions which aren't >>available on Linux S/390, so that stuff is stuck on an NT box for now. >> The server extensions are available for linux on intel, and >>OS/390, but >>not Linux on S/390. What substitutes are people using? >> > >One customer of ours is using a small Linux Intel box (on an old Pentium 90) >as a staging and testing server for the FP users, and then using rsync to >put the content into production on the Linux/390 instances. Gives them a >two-stage commit to production, and avoids the NT box. > >-- db >
