> > I read the first part of that last sentence as saying: "We're having > > trouble keeping VSE support going as it is, without worrying about > > 64-bit." > > Phil: You are reading something in to this that is not there. We have > almost no requirement to make VSE/ESA itself 64-bit capable.
Wasn't what "first part of the last sentence" referred to. >> Because protection of extensive existing core VSE investments is a >> key objective for VSE/ESA Version 2 Release 7, ... That was the justification given, not that there is little or no demand for 64-bit addressing. Any such requirement is much more likely to come from the desire to run applications only available in that form, rather than any real practical need. -- Phil Payne http://www.isham-research.com +44 7785 302 803 +49 173 6242039
