Dave,
Can Systems/C be used for kernel development? Or does Linux still have a
number of "gcc dependancies" as I've read in the past? Or course, few of us
actually cross compile the kernel itself.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas David Rivers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 10:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: so correct me if I am wrong
>
>
> >
> > My experience has been that cross-compiling is risky, at
> best.  While
> > working to port SAPDB, one of the other people helping was doing
> > cross-compiles, and getting different results than I was.
> Setting up
> > a cross-compile environment is apparently not easy to do
> correctly, so
> > I try to avoid it as much as possible.
>
>  Cross-compiling is risky... but, it can be done.  Earlier
> versions  of gcc had problems, but it's getting better (and,
> of course  <plug>Systems/C</plug> gets it right.)
>
>  We'd be happy to discuss this with anyone who's interested;
> feel free to contact me off-line.
>
>         - Dave Rivers -
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]                        Work: (919) 676-0847
> Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com
>
> >
> > Mark Post
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tzafrir Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 11:30 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: so correct me if I am wrong
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Post, Mark K wrote:
> >
> > > Since they do put out the SRPMs (source RPMs), you can download
> > > those and build the binary for installation, but that can
> be, ummm,
> > > a chore, and it certainly chews up CPU time for packages of any
> > > size.  (I'm currently in
> > the
> > > process of re-building glibc 2.2.5, and it's going on 24 hours of
> > > wall
> > clock
> > > time.  Open Office took me about a _month_, on a much
> bigger machine
> > > that this one.)
> >
> > Why not put some cheepo intel with a faster CPU to the task?
> >
> > rpms should generally allow cross-platform building. I
> admit I haven't
> > tried that, But the time it would take you to set that up
> (in addition
> > to the compilation time of OOo) will still probably be less than a
> > month.
> >
> > (Disclaimer: I have never tried this: nither rpm
> cross-building, nor
> > building the OOo beast ;-) )
> >
> > --
> > Tzafrir Cohen
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir
> >
>

Reply via email to