OK, Here it is again; >Greetings; > >I get this error if the system has been "idle" for awhile. >In this case it was about 10hr 02min. I had 4 logons through >ssh but they were not doing anything. > >I am running the 2.4.19 kernel w/timer patch. >That is kernel-image-2.4.19-s390 from debian.org >with no other patches applied. > >I don't remember having a similar problem on the original woody kerne. > >TIA for any help. >Dennis > > >00:00:48 00: CON FILE 0038 SENT TO MAINT RDR AS 6012 RECS 0298 CPY 001 T >NOHOLD NOKEEP >00:00:52 HCPCFX6769I Your SECUSER terminated by SYSMON. >07:35:02 device ctc0 left promiscuous mode >07:35:06 device ctc0 entered promiscuous mode >07:36:41 kernel BUG at swap.c:62! >illegal operation: 0001 >CPU: 1 Tainted: P >Process apache (pid: 669, task: 012d0000, ksp: 012d1c60) >Krnl PSW : 07080000 80041fac >Krnl GPRS: 012bcb00 012d1b4c 00000019 00000001 > 80041faa 00000000 0155c600 00000001 > 001c0f44 001c0b00 002fe488 00000001 > 002fe4a0 80041ee4 80041faa 012d1c48 >Krnl ACRS: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > 00000001 00000000 00000000 00000000 > 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 >Krnl Code: 58 30 d0 14 18 2a 58 10 30 00 a7 2a 00 1c 58 40 d0 18 50 20 >Call Trace: -<00039298>- -<000448dc>- -<00044cbe>- -<00035914>- -<00036116>- >-<00014604>-
Again, TIA! Dennis |--------+------------------------------------------> | | Ulrich Weigand | | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | langen.de> | | | Sent by: Linux on 390 Port | | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | | | | | | | | 03/18/2003 06:07 PM | | | Please respond to Linux on 390 | | | Port | | | | |--------+------------------------------------------> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Re: Help! Was: kernel BUG at swap.c:62! | >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Dennis Wicks wrote: >If anyone needs more info let me know and I will do my best to >dig it out. How about your kernel version? It's kind of hard to find the correct line 62 in swap.c without knowing which kernel ;-) Could you describe the type of workload you are running? Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand [EMAIL PROTECTED]